The Role of the United States inside the Darfur Genocide
Posted by admin under Society News | Permalink | | Leave A Comment
By Mark Hoerrner
It?s been nearly four years since Sudan?s internal conflict started. Far more than 200,000 non-Muslim Sudanese have been raped and/or slaughtered and a lot more than two million individuals now reside in makeshift refugee camps.
Yet, the U.S. has done nothing. For some time, the U.S. State Department would not even call the situation in Darfur a genocide while it argued internally over policy tactics and what responsibility the U.S. would have once the situation was upgraded to reflect the mass slaughter taking place inside the African nation.
An interview on CBS?s “60 Minutes” program having a doctor residing in Darfur noted that the genocide will be tough to stop while the U.S. relies on the Sudanese government for intelligence within the war on terror. Apparently, Sudan has been very forthcoming with information on various cells around the planet, leading the U.S. to take an almost blind position with respect to the daily carnage in Darfur. The statements of witnesses are difficult to hear and perhaps that’s the accurate reason for the lack of action.
“Usually ahead of the attacks happen,” 1 witness to the horror said, “the government troops will surround a village and begin firing artillery into the area. Shortly following that, the Janjaweed will ride in. They pull everyone out with the buildings and separate the men and women. The women are raped?not by 1 man, but by several, numerous men?after which killed. Anyone who escapes is then killed by the Sudanese Army troops outside the village. The men are cut into pieces and those pieces are dropped into the wells. All with the buildings are burned. Once they’re done along with the fires have stopped, it?s like the village in no way existed.”
In 2004, the United Nations Security Council passed resolution 1556 that demands the Sudanese government disarm the Janjaweed militia which it uses to fight two separate rebel groups. This was not followed and also the U.N. has not bolstered forces within the region to enforce the resolution. In 2006, a peace agreement was signed with among the rebel factions that included the 2004 resolution as a key element. In August of 2006, the U.N. authorized a peacekeeping force within the region, but the lack of implementation has produced the U.N. presence within the area 1 of little concern for a government that continues a daily campaign of terror and murder against its own citizens.
At least the U.S. remains the largest contributor to the humanitarian aid getting distributed inside the camps. The U.S. has pledged $299 million in aid by way of next year, although only about $140 million has been spent thus far.
The latest act by the U.N. would be to transition the current African Union forces into the larger U.N. peacekeeping force that should give the region some stability. Still, without the commitment of military forces from the U.S. and with the U.S. facing a war on two fronts already, it?s likely that the process of restoring peace within the area will be a lengthy and arduous road.